Науковий вісник НГУ

Justification of geodetic monitoring methodology of the retaining walls on the example of the embankment in Kremenchuk

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №1 2024

Last Updated on 29 February 2024

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 1156

Authors:

P.B.Mikhno*, orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-6478, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.M.Shelkovska, orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-381X, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.I.Kozar, orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-3507, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.M.Kliuka, orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-1157, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Yu.Ye.Trehub, orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-245X, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (1): 076 - 083

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-1/076

Abstract:

Purpose. Development of a methodology for analyzing the results of geodetic measurements according to which it is possible to use the materials of past years for the needs of geodetic monitoring on the example of a retaining wall in the conditions of the city’s recreational area.

Methodology. A technological scheme of geodetic monitoring of retaining walls has been developed with four main stages: analysis of initial data, design of geodetic monitoring, periodic observations, processing and analysis of geodetic monitoring results. The conditions of the recreational areas of the city determine the specifics of geodetic monitoring, limit the possibilities of choosing a scheme of the geodetic network and methods of measurements. In this regard, it is proposed to develop models of the development of deformation processes already at the first stage of geodetic monitoring, which will allow geodetic monitoring to be carried out with greater reliability in the future and avoid possible forecasting errors.

Findings. The results of the analysis of geodetic measurements in the geodetic networks of Kremenchuk (coordinates and heights of wall signs) show the presence of horizontal and vertical displacements of the retaining wall. In the horizontal plane the retaining wall has shifted in the south-western direction, towards the Dnipro River. In the vertical plane, the retaining wall has subsided. The displacements of different parts of the retaining wall are uneven. The average annual rate of both horizontal and vertical displacements is equivalent and is approximately 1 mm/year. The values of absolute displacement vectors of wall signs in the horizontal plane exceed the accuracy of geodetic measurements and normative tolerances.

Originality. Modeling of displacements of retaining walls in the conditions of recreational areas of the city is already underway, taking into account the analysis of the results of geodetic measurements of past years.

Practical value. The data of the analysis of the results of geodetic measurements carried out in the geodetic densification networks of Kremenchuk indicate the presence of deformation processes and justify the need for their control through geodetic monitoring. The suggested models can be used as the comparative and combined analysis of future forecast changes based on previous and current results of measurements, which is a topic for another research.

Keywords: geodetic monitoring, retaining wall, wall sign

References.

1. Sztubecki, J., Bujarkiewicz, A., Derejczyk, K., & Przytuła, M. (2020). Displacement and deformation study of engineering structures with the use of modern laser technologies. Open Geosciences, 12(1), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0051.

2. Isaiev, O. P., Adamenko, O. V., Shults, R. V., Bilous, M. V., Kry­vyi, O. P., & Khailak, A. M. (2013). Geodetic monitoring – from the experience of performing geodetic works of the Department of Engineering Geodesy of KNUBA. Urban development and spatial planning, 47, 265-277.

3. Hryhorovskyi, P. Ye., & Chukanova, N. P. (2013). Methodology for selecting effective methods for monitoring the technical condition of buildings during their operation. New technologies in construction, 25-26, 7-16.

4. Annenkov, A. O. (2016). Modeling of spatial displacements of points of the European permanent GNSS network EPN/EUREF by the finite element method. Urban development and spatial planning, 62(1), 20-35.

5. Smolii, K. (2015). Analysis of modern geodetic and geotechnical methods of monitoring the structures deformation. Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry, 1, 7-89.

6. Mikhno, P. B., Shelkovska, I. M., Kozar, V. I., & Lashko, S. P. (2021). Peculiarities of estate of the national geodesic network in the central region of Ukraine. Municipal Economy of Cities. Series: Engineering Science and Architecture, 4(164), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2021-4-164-128-135.5.

7. Medvedskyi, Yu. V., Annenkov, A. O., & Isaiev, O. P. (2022). Automation of geodetic monitoring of high-rise structures. Urban development and spatial planning, 81, 244-253. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.81.244-253.

8. Zayats, O. S., Tretyak, K. R., Smirnova, O. M., & Tserklevych, A. L. (2021). Development and implementation of automated system of geodetic monitoring on Tereble-Rikska HPP for structural control of engineering constructions. 15 ^th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215K2089.

9. Moroz, O. I., Dultsev, A. T., Sidorov, I. S., Serant, O. V., Tartachynska, Z. R., Yamelynets, S. P., & Karpenko, N. I. (2013). About geodynamic observations on nature-reserved territories. Herald of geodesy and cartography, 2(83), 15-18.

10. Zygmunt, M., Garczyńska, I., & Zalewski, P. (2022). Complex monitoring of vertical land motions corresponding to geological structure of coastal and river areas in Northwestern Poland. Applied Sciences (Switherland), 12(14), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146914.

11. Bauer, P., & Lienhart, W. (2023). 3D concept creation of permanent geodetic monitoring installations and the a priori assessment of systematic effects using Virtual Reality. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 17(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0020.

12. Yuwono, B. D., & Prasetyo, Y. (2019). Analysis Deformation Monitoring Techniques Using GNSS Survey and Terrestrial Survey (Case Studi: Diponegoro University Dam,Semarang, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 313(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/313/1/012045.

13. Lepădatu, D., Morariu, D. I., Cherradi, T., Rotaru, A., & Judele, L. (2019). Smart technology optimization by multicriteria analysis of civil engineering structure in service stage through topo-geodetic monitoring. ACM International Conference Proceeding series, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368756.3369055.

14. Annenkov, А. О. (2020). Application of the neural networks method in geodetic monitoring of engineering structures. Journal of Kryvyi Rih National University, 51, 8-16.

15. Khailak, A. M. (2016). The using of cluster analysis for identification of uniform areas of anti landslides structures displacements. Engineering Geodesy, 63, 55-66.

16. Shults, R. V., Annenkov, A. O., & Khailak, A. M. (2013). Peculiarities of the landslide monitoring project implementation on the example of construction of a residential complex in Kyiv. Urban development and spatial planning, 49, 632-646.

17. DSTU N B V.2.1-31:2014. Guidelines for the design of retaining walls (2017). Retrieved from https://dbn.co.ua/load/normativy/dstu/b_v_2_1_31/5-1-0-1761.

18. DBN V.2.4-3:2010. Hydraulic structures. Main provisions (n.d.). Retrieved from https://e-construction.gov.ua/laws_detail/3083665195382343409?doc_type=2.

19. Ishutina, H. S. (2016). The technology of improving the reliability of geodetic monitoring. Bulletin of Prydnyprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2, 32-36.

20. Alizadeh-Khameneh, M. A., Eshagh, M., & Jensen, A. B. O. (2018). Optimization of deformation monitoring networks using finite element strain analysis. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 12(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0040.

21. Liu, B., & Wei, Y. (2019). Optimization of installation of deformation monitoring of multiple points by optical methods. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for optical engineering, 11137. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2528766.

22. Mikhno, P. B., Lisovenko, I. V., Bushuiev, D., & Ryzhenko, I. V. (2022). Features of application of modern geodesic technologies in constructing. Technical Sciences and Technologies, 3(29), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5363-2022-3(29)-198-209.

23. Shults, R. V., & Khailak, A. M. (2018). Application of the group method of data handling for prediction of points vertical displacements on the landslide. Engineering Geodesy, 65, 65-83.

24. Hladilin, V. M., Dubkova, A. O., Chulanov, P. O., & Shudra, N. S. (2019). Deformations models from physical process. Engineering Geodesy, 66, 52-63.

25. Gladilin, V., Belenok, V., & Shudra, N. (2022). Determining the form of error distribution of geodetic measuring. Geodesy and Cartography (Vilnius), 48(2), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2022.14403.

26. Cherniaha, P. H., Nikulishyn, V. I., Pryimak, M. A., & Bleianiuk, T. V. (2014). Experimental cartographic modeling of dynamics of landslides areas according to geodesic observations. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 80, 69-78.

27. Dovhopoliuk, L. O., Omelchuk, S. K., Soloviov, I. L., & Soloviova, N. P. (2022). Geodesic monitoring and mathematical processing of data of deformations buildings and structures. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, 111, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2022-111-106-114.

28. Korniienko, M. V., Zhuk, V. V., Chehodaiev, I. S., & Poklonskyi, S. V. (2016). Peculiarities of geodetic monitoring of buildings on slab foundations. Building structures, 83(2), 606-615.

29. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (n.d.). Rules of technical operation of port hydraulic structures. Order of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine No. 257 dated 27.05.2005. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1191-05#Text.

30. Petrakovska, O. S., Trehub, M. V., Trehub, Y. Y., & Zabolotna, Y. O. (2022). Planning models of sanitary protection zones around mode-forming objects. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (5), 122-127. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-5/122.

31. Vynohradenko, S., Siedov, A., Trehub, M., Zakharchenko, Y., & Trehub, Y. (2022). Features of Providing Engineering and Infrastructure Objects with Geospatial Information. Review of Economics and Finance, 20, 639-646. Retrieved from https://refpress.org/ref-vol20-a74/.

32. Hnatushenko, V., Kogut, P., & Uvarov, M. (2021). On flexible co-registration of optical and sar satellite images. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 1246 AISC, 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54215-3_33.

• < Prev
• Next >